Fix #10198: Be robust against missing annotations #10212
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In 6f32b62, I made sure the compiler could survive parsing a Java
classfile referring to annotations missing from the classpath, but we
could still run into trouble when a Scala unpickled class does the same.
Tweaking the Tasty unpickler to drop missing annotations would require
always forcing the symbols of all annotations which I would rather avoid
doing. Instead, we adopt the same solution as Scala 2 did in
sbt/zinc#701 and special-case the single place
where we force annotations of inherited members to ignore missing
annotations.